Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (5) TMI 985

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Judicial) For the Appeleant : Shri Kamaljeet Singh For the Resoindent : Shri R K Mishra ORDER The appellants are in appeal against the  impugned order for imposing penalty  under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.  Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the penalty has been imposed on the appellants  on the ground  that  appellants have is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on ble High Court has held that  Tribunal cannot     observing that penalty is on higher side.   2. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 3. In this case, the appellants are relying on the decision of this Tribunal for reduction of  penalty in the case of  appellants himself and in the case of Adhunik  Steel Ltd. and M/s. Tata Steel (supr....