2015 (5) TMI 985
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(Judicial) For the Appeleant : Shri Kamaljeet Singh For the Resoindent : Shri R K Mishra ORDER The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order for imposing penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the penalty has been imposed on the appellants on the ground that appellants have is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on ble High Court has held that Tribunal cannot observing that penalty is on higher side. 2. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 3. In this case, the appellants are relying on the decision of this Tribunal for reduction of penalty in the case of appellants himself and in the case of Adhunik Steel Ltd. and M/s. Tata Steel (supr....
TaxTMI