2007 (5) TMI 56

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CDM-77-78/2006 are allowed since stay petitions in respect of other appellants filed against the very same impugned order have been allowed earlier by order dated-13-7-2006 and with the consent of both sides, these two appeals as well as 19 other appeals listed for hearing this week bearing Nos. 44-62/2006 are taken up for hearing and disposal. 3. In all these appeals, the common issue is whethe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....& Central Excise, Chandigarh-II reported in 2003 (151) E. L. T. 180 (Tri.-Del.) (iii) Frito-Lay India v. Commr. of C. Ex., Pune reported in 2007 (207) E.L.T. 560 (Tri.-Mumbai). The ld. Counsels also state that the Department did not file any appeal against the decision in the case of Tiemac Snack Food Pvt. Ltd (cited supra) and hence the same has attained finality Further, they fairly state that....