2015 (5) TMI 952

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... R. Periasami: None appeared today on behalf of the appellant.  However the learned Counsel for the appellant vide his letter dated 24.01.2015 informed that he could not participate in the stay proceedings and he mentioned that on behalf of the appellant, he had already filed written submissions along with vakalatnama on 24.10.2014.  He also requessted that the stay application may be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the findings of the learned Commissioner.  She submits that Shri Ram Gopal Kudal has made a conspiracy with Shri Shyam Bihani and obtained Advance licence fraudulently in the name of M/s. Narayan Impex and M/s. Shree Shyam Exports by deliberately mis-declaring supporting manufacturers.  In this regard, she relied on this Bench's Miscellaneous Order No.42226-42229/2014, dated 04.12.14 on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mmissioner (Appeals) is against the penalty of Rs. 52,56,555/-.  Since it is clearly established the entire advance licence has been obtained fraudulently, as has been clearly brought out in the Order-in-Original at P.23, prima facie, as the role of Shri Ram Gopal Kudal has been established. 4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is directed to deposit ....