Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (12) TMI 1167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Shri Nitin Mehta, CA For the Respondent : Shri R K Das, Dy. Commissioner (AR) ORDER NO.A/3928/15/STB ORDER Per P S Pruthi The appellant are engaged in manufacture of goods falling under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. One of the goods used by them is 'Vacuum Interrupters'. This requires to be tested for performance standards. The appellant sent the Vac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ated 11/08/2010. Appellant are before us against this order of Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Heard both sides and considered the submissions. 3. We find that lower authorities have upheld the liability of service tax under the category of Technical testing and analysis under section 65(105)(zzh). Further, by applying the rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with section 66A of the F....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) Rules, 2006 determine the fact as to when a service is considered to be received in India. In the present case, admittedly during the period in question, the service categorized under section 65(105)(zz) is covered under Rule 3(ii). The lower authorities have failed to understand the provisions of Rule 3 ibid, particularly Rule 3(ii). Proviso to Rule 3(ii) states that when a service is partly pe....