Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (12) TMI 1137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....& Mr Nirmal R Mehta, Adv ORDER ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi ) 1. The petitioner has challenged the action of the Sales Tax Department of the State Government in attaching her private property being a leasehold rights on plot No.346, Block-A, NU-3, Apana Nagar, Gandhidham with a superstructure thereon. 2. Brief facts are as under:- 2.1 The petitioner purchased the said property ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd of the petitioner, the Department attached the property of the petitioner. No formal order was served to the petitioner. However, the petitioner came to know about the same when the petitioner tried to sale the property and the transfer was prevented by Kandla Port Trust on account of such attachment. The petitioner has thereupon filed this petition with a prayer to quash the action of the Sale....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... question was purchased from the sources other than that of the petitioner herself. It is not the case of the Department that the sale transaction of 31.12.1994 was 'benami' transaction and that the husband of the petitioner had funded for purchase of the property. In any case, as noted, the sale took place on 31.12.1994 and the husband of the petitioner started his current business in the....