Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 994

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Ranjana Jha, JCDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Learned Consultant submits that report of CRCL is not correct in respect of testing of polyester fabric (un-textured) imported by the appellant. IIT by its report, dated 26-4-2006 opined that goods declared by the appellant were correct. The adjudicating authority has not allowed retesting of the goods nor allowed cross-examination of chemic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....msp;We are unable to find any pleading before the Commissioner (Appeals) as to the desirability of cross-examination of chemical examiner at the interest of justice when CRCL report remained unchallenged and IIT report was obtained by appellant without making Revenue a party thereof. There was no challenge before that Authority as to the departure to the prescribed norm by CRCL. Ld. Commissioner (....