2015 (12) TMI 723
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S. Sharma, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of stay we proceed to decide the appeal itself inasmuch as the short issue is involved. 2. The Commissioner vide his impugned order has confirmed the duty of Rs. 90,00,000/- (Rupees Ninety lakh only) along with interest and imposition of penalties on the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is in hands of DGFT officers. If the said certificates are not being issued by DGFT, the assessee cannot be blamed for the same. We would like to observe here that number of such type of orders are repeatedly argued before us whereas inspite of an assessee having done his part of the job, the DGFT authority are not issuing necessary certificates. Such type of inaction on the part of the DGFT offic....
TaxTMI