2015 (12) TMI 720
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Appellant. Shri S. Jain, (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has dropped the demand of differential duty in respect of imported ceramic tiles, but has upheld the confiscation of the same with option to redeem the goods on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 2 Lakhs and has upheld the imposition of penalty of Rs.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....annot be a co-incidence that in both the case MRP stickers were not found on many packets and this goes against the Appellants. Thus, the charge of not complying with the provisions of Notification No. 2/2006-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2006, as amended read with Notification No. 44 (RE-2000)/1997-2002, dated 24-11-2000 as amended and the provisions of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read wi....
TaxTMI