2015 (12) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader with A. D. Kango, Additional Government Pleader, for the respondents. JUDGMENT By this writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated August 21, 2014 rejecting an application under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (for short, "the Act"). The petitioner is a company incorporated under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ms of the sub-contract agreement dated June 30, 2014. 4. There are two sub-contractors and it is the case of the petitioner that the entire works contract agreement was back to back assigned to two subcontractors in entirety with due permission from the fourth respondent, leaving no work except supervising both sub-contractors in regard to the quality of the work executed by them. According to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Joshi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner raised various contentions and particularly with regard to validity and interpretation of the sub-section and clauses thereof. However, we clarify that it is not necessary to examine them nor the answer or reply thereto from the respondents. Keeping that issue alive and open for being raised at an appropriate stage and in appropria....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not only the agreement dated April 2, 2014, but other agreements under which the works have been sub-contracted. The petitioner's stand that it has not been executing any works contract under the relevant provisions and within the definition of the said term under the Act requires a proper and complete examination and scrutiny. That has not been admittedly done in passing this one line order.....