2005 (4) TMI 576

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Adv. For sole Respondent: Ms. Suruchii Agarwal, Adv. Mr. D.N.Mehta, Adv. Ms. Meera Agarwal, Adv. O R D E R This Appeal is filed against an order of the Delhi High Court dated 20th April, 2004. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:- The Respondent admittedly gave information regarding clandestine import of machinery without payment of duty b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y of reward in spite of numerous letters, the Respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court.  The High Court has, by the impugned Order, directed the payment of final reward amount in terms of the policy.  It was further directed that the reward amount will be paid within 15 days from the date on which a copy of the High Court Order is produced with interest @ 15% p.a., failing whic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no substance in the challenge to the impugned Order.  It is the Committee which has decided that Rs. 9.5 lakhs is payable. To that extent the Appellants cannot have any grievance.  We are not concerned with and do not go into the question whether the sum of Rs. 9.5 lakhs can be said to be in compliance of the impugned Order.  We are told that a Contempt Petition has been taken out i....