Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 952

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent : Dr. B.R. Meena, Addl. Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: Shri Anil Choudhary The appellant M/s Vaidyanath Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. is registered with Service Tax department for Banking and other Financial Services. The appellant had availed CENVAT Credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on the duty paid services availed by the appellant. Some of the services are partially exempted v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....redit Rules, 2004. Being aggrieved the appellant had carried the matter before the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant had raised the ground that it had reversed the total amount of CENVAT Credit availed for the common input service along with interest and the same was repaid by challan, a copy of which is annexed at page 27 of the appeal memorandum. This contention also find reference in para 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994." It is further contended by the appellant that Division Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Nagar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-929-CESTAT-MUM, after considering the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Jost's Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai -III - 2013-TIOL-732-CESTAT-MUM and also the ruling of the Hon&#3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion the reversal of whole of the credit of common input service, proper relief was allowed. The appellant also strongly contends that in view of the definition of Exempt Service, they do not fall under this provision of Rule 6(3). 3. The learned AR relies on the impugned order, but does not dispute the rulings relied upon by the Counsel for the appellant. 4. Having considered the rival contentio....