2015 (11) TMI 928

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....umar Chopda, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Challenging the order of the 1st respondent dated 14.09.2015 refusing to grant an order of stay, the petitioner is now before this court with this writ petition. 2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the petitioner is a company engaged in the manufacture and distribution of Indian Made Foreign Liquor and an assessee in terms of the provisions ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d this constituted expenditure for the petitioner. Pursuant to bottling and labelling, the petitioner sold the liquor both its own brand as well as the brands of companies to TASMAC and remitted the sale consideration attributable to each company after deducting a flat contracted rate towards its charges in connection with bottling. According to the petitioner, the assessing authority did not init....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax (Appeals) and the same is pending. In the mean while, the 1st respondent while rejecting the petition for stay called upon the petitioner to pay 50% of the disputed demand on or before 21.09.2015. The said order is now under challenge in this writ petition. 4. Heard both sides and also perused the records carefully. 5. Though the order refusing to grant an order of interim stay is put under ....