Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 778

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) For the Respondent : Shri Harish Bindu Madhavan, Advocate ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran These two appeals are filed by Revenue as well as by assessee-appellant against Order-in-Original No. 02/STC-I/BR/11-12 dated 21.04.2011. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is non-payment of service tax on an amount received by the appellant-assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. 6. On consideration of the submissions made by both sides, we find that the adjudicating authority has clearly recorded that the issue involved in this case is whether the service tax on an amount received as incentive discount is sustainable or otherwise. The said incentive discount is received by the appellant-assessee from the media companies which p....