2015 (11) TMI 719
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri Yespal Sharma, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The application is for recalling of the Final Order Nos. 55528-55529/2013 dated 6-2-2013 vide which the appeals filed by the appellant were rejected by upholding the order of Commissioner (Appeals). The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal on the point of limitation by observing that inasmuch as the appeals were....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... an issue relatable to excise and the appeal has to be treated as an excise appeal. As such his submission that there is no merits in the appellant submissions. We agree with the learned DR. We have seen the order passed by the original adjudicating authority vide which he Is denying the Cenvat credit to the appellant in terms of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A of the Ce....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI