2015 (11) TMI 602
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel, who took notice for the respondent and with their consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for hearing. 2. This writ petition has been filed by M/s.Sulzer Friction Systems (India) Ltd., represented by its Director V. Bhaskararamam, challenging the impugned order in original No.24/2015 (....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai Tribunal also in the very same petitioner's case for the previous period viz., 01.04.2008 to 30.09.2013 by order dated 24.06.2015, has held the petitioner, appellant therein had made out a case for waiver of total demand and accordingly there will be waiver of pre-deposit and the application for stay of recovery during pendency of appeal was allowed. When t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peal before the CESTAT along with stay application, without making pre-deposit of 7.5% of the tax amount confirmed against the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. But, as far as the present case is concerned, since the petitioner has got enough time to file an appeal before the appellate authority, the petitioner is directed to file an appeal ....