2015 (10) TMI 2144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : For thePetitioner Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate : For the Respondent.  ORDER Barin Ghosh, C.J. Considering the sufficiency of the reasons for delay in preferring the appeal, we allow the application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal. 2. Central Excise Notification bearing No. 49/2003, dated 10th June, 2003 exempted industries as that of the respondent from payme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stead the number of some other Notification and date thereof crept in. It is the contention of the respondent that when the declaration was submitted, Notification number and the date thereof was not mentioned and the same was supplied by somebody from the Excise Department. We need not go into that controversy. The fact remains that there is no dispute that the declaration was submitted before th....