Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1979

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kur, Member (T) For the Appellant : Sri Arijit Chakraborty, Adv For the Respondent : Sri K Choudhuri, Supdt. (AR) ORDER Per H K Thakur Stay application Nos. E/Stay/70374/2013 & E/Stay70375/2013 have been filed respectively by the main appellant M/s. Jharna Cement Ltd. and Shri R.N. Singh, M.D. of the main appellant E/Misc/75422/2015 has been filed by the Revenue for early hearing of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s strongly argued by the Advocate that stay against the recovery of the confirmed demand and penalty may be allowed as no correct quantification of duty has been done by the department. 3. Shri K. Choudhury Supdt. (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the respondent argued that summons were issued to all the witnesses whose cross-examination were asked by the appellants. That Revenue can only make effo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 10/01/2013 confirming a demand of Rs. 2,62,04,776/-, alongwith interest, and an equivalent amount of penalty was also imposed upon the main appellant. A penalty of Rs. 50,00,000/- was imposed upon Shri R.N. Singh, Managing Director of the main appellant. It is observed from the case records that during visit of the Central Excise officers on 21/09/2005, 7 chits were found against which 85MT of c....