2015 (10) TMI 1650

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate, for the Appellant. Shri N. Jagdish, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent. ORDER The impugned adjudication order dated 7-6-2013 confirms differential central excise duty to Rs. 27.59 lakhs (approx.) apart from the interest and penalty on the ground that in the Ayurvedic medicament 'Amrutanjan Pain Balm' manufactured by the appellant does not satisfy conditions of Notificatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oduct in the First Schedule of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. 2. The appellant has pre-deposited of Rs. 14,00,000/- of the assessed duty liability. 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant contends that the last phrase of the Notification is not an essential condition. This contention appears prima facie not substantial though an arguable proposition. In the circumstances, we grant wai....