Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1438

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent : Sh. B.S. Purushotham, CA ORDER PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VI, Chennai, dated 30.08.2013 and pertains to assessment year 2006-07. 2. Sh. Joe Sebastian, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the only issue arises for consideration is with regard to addition ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee-company under the pretext of receiving advance money from sister concern for purchasing of iron ore, received the advance in violation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. According to the Ld. D.R., even though the assessee claims that the transaction between the assessee and its sister concern was commercial in nature, no such commercial requirement was established. Therefore, the receipt of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resentative, the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act will not be applicable. 4. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material on record. It is not in dispute that the assessee-company is not a shareholder in M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited. Section 2(22)(e) of the Act clearly says that any payment made by a company by way of advance or loa....