2015 (10) TMI 1171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocate For The Respondent: Shri Raju, Commissioner (A.R), Dr. J. Nagori, Authorised Representative Per: P.K. Das 1. Learned Advocate on behalf of the Appellant submits that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice.  He submits that the personal hearing was fixed for three dates by one hearing notice, which is contrary to the provisions of Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....portunities for personal hearing had been granted and no further adjournment shall be granted as per proviso to Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.  We find that three dates of hearing were granted by one notice, which is not proper as per the proviso to Section 33A of the said Act, 1944 as held by the Tribunal in the case of Imtiaz Ahmedad (supra).  We have also considered that....