2015 (10) TMI 1097
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....a, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. R. Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. Kausik Dey, Adv. And Mr. K.K. Maity, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. N.K. Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Arijit Chakraborty, Adv. and Mr. Debaditya Banerjee, Adv. ORDER The Court : The appeal has been preferred by the revenue against an order dated 4.12.2014 by which the learned Trial Court directed provisional release of the goods seized by the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....17.3.2015 we directed the writ petitioner to produce papers to show that the goods seized are indigenous as claimed by them and such papers have been produced. Papers required by the revenue have also been produced. In spite thereof, the revenue is unable to show that they had any reason to believe that the goods in question were liable to confiscation. Learned Advocate has not pointed out any inf....
TaxTMI