2015 (10) TMI 883
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h Nair, Member (J) For the Appellant : Shri S Thirumalai, Adv For the Respondent : Shri K M Mondal, Spl Counsel ORDER Per P S Pruthi This ROM application is filed by Revenue on two grounds namely: - There is an apparent error in the Tribunal order dt. 27.01.2015 to the effect that on the one hand CESTAT has set aside the demand of Rs. 31,25,737/- and Rs. 5,65,600/- and allo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s not mentioned. Hence, the verification does not lead to the conclusion that the services were used in the Mafatlal House. 2. We have carefully considered the submissions of the ld. AR and the ld. Counsel. 3. As regards the first issue we find that our Order is very clear. The order allows the CENVAT credit in principle. It was remanded only to be verified by the adjudicating authority that....
TaxTMI