2015 (10) TMI 871

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ashutosh Upadhyay, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri M.S. Negi, DR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that appellant is manufacturer of plastic pipes accessories falling under chapter 39 of Sprinkler System falling under chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. The appellant has cleared HDPE Sprinkler....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l is that as appellant is paying amount equal to 10% of the value of HDEP pipes which have gone in the manufacture of sprinkler system, they are not required to pay an amount equal to 10% of the value of Sprinkler system in the light of the decision of this Tribunal in their own case vide final order No.50576/2014-SMB dated 10.02.2014. 5. The Ld. Counsel reiterated the findings of the impugned ....