2015 (10) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ECHNICAL MEMBER For the Appellant : Mr. Anil Nigam, Addl. Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Mr. C. Saravanan & S. Thenmozhi, Advocates ORDER: Per : ARCHANA WADHWA Being aggrieved with a part of the impugned order of the Commissioner, Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. It is seen that vide his impugned order Commissioner classified the newsprint in reels manufactu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on stands wrongly extended to the respondents by the Commissioner. 4. It stands brought to our notice that a part of the Commissioners order holding the classification under heading 4823.90 was also put to challenge by the respondent, before the Tribunal and vide its Final Order No.1069/2006 dated 18.5.2006, the classification of Newsprint in reel form was held to be falling under heading 48....