2015 (10) TMI 785
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s Sanghavi For the Respondent : Mr Pradeep S Jetly with Mr Jitendra B Mishra ORDER P.C. 1. Rule. By consent of parties, rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners have challenged two orders, both dated 31st July, 2015 (Annexures A1 and A2 to the Petition), under which the Refund Application....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l hearing be accorded to the Petitioners before any adverse order is passed in relation to their refund claim, and they reserve their right to make submissions thereafter. Mr Paranjape submitted that despite this, the impugned orders were passed on the merits of the Refund Applications and without giving the Petitioners any prior hearing. 4. Mr Jetly, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the ....
TaxTMI