2015 (9) TMI 977

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsel, for the Appellant. Shri O. Swroop for V.J. Sankaram, Counsels, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The respondent is a manufacturer of disinfectants that are mostly used in poultry industry. One of the products manufactured by it is ''Virkon-S''. The respondent claimed the status of small scale industry as well as the benefit of exemption of Excise duty in terms of Central Excise Tariff No....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant filed an appeal before the Commissioner feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 29-12-2003. The appeal was allowed by the Commissioner on 29-4-2005, confirming the demand. Hence, the respondent filed Appeal No. E/843/2005 before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (for short 'the Tribunal'). Through its order, dated 2-2-2006, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by follo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssioner reopened the matter by issuing a show cause notice. That was preceded by recording a statement by the Managing Director of the respondent-company 5. The basis for reopening of the proceedings was that the disinfectant was sold with the brand name ''Virkon-S'', which in turn is the one owned by M/s. Antec International, United Kingdom. The plea of the respondent was that though it h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Government clarified this aspect by adding Explanation X, which reads: Explanation. - For the purpose of this notification, where the specified goods manufactured by a manufacturer, bear a brand name or trade name (registered or not) of another manufacturer or trader, such specified goods shall not, merely by reason of that fact, be deemed to have been manufactured by such other manufacturer....