2013 (2) TMI 697
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Appellant. Shri D.D. Joshi, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. BR (16) 16/STC/2005, dated 29-7-2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I. 2. The appellant M/s. M.L. Shah & Co. (Machinery) Pvt. Ltd., Thane are manufacturers of stone processing, polishing machines and electrical panel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....impugned order dismissed the appeal. Hence the appellant is before us. 3. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. 4. As the appeal pertains to the year 2005, we have taken up the appeal with the assistance of the learned Superintendent (AR), who appeared for the Revenue. The learned AR reiterates the findings of the adjudicating and appellate authorities. 5. We have gone ....
TaxTMI