Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (4) TMI 711

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate assisted by Shri Kuljeet Rawal, learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellants and Ms Sudha Koka, learned SDR, appeared for the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. 4. The learned Advocate stated that the appellants filed two Bills of Entry for warehousing the imported cargo. They imported edible oils through Mangalore Port. The edible oils which they imported are entitled for concessional rate of duty in terms of Notification No. 21/2002 dated 01.03.2002 as amended if it satisfies certain conditions. The main condition for concessional rate of duty is the carotene value should be between 500/- and 1500/-. The samples were taken immediately when the vessles arrived and they were sent for test. The appellants cleared the goods ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st because the test results were communicated to them only after a period of one and half years. By that time the retest could not have been done because it has already been held on the basis of the technical literature and scientific opinion that the carotene value decreases over time and it will not test the same over a long period of time. He stated, even though these facts are pointed out to the lower authorities they actually ignored the same and committed gross judicial indiscipline in confirming the demand. 6. The learned Departmental Representative stated that the facts of this case are different from the facts of the case upheld by the Karnataka High Court. She said that in the present case, the samples were drawn immediately and ....