2015 (9) TMI 718
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Petitioner : Mr. G.V. Narasinga Rao For the Respondent : None ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This writ petition is filed challenging the communication dated 23-12-2002 issued by the 1^st respondent as illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Section 85 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short, 'the Act'). Briefly stated, the facts are....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ny adjudication. As such, if the petitioner is so advised, it can make a representation in relation thereto. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is not in dispute that the petitioner stored the goods imported by it, viz., cigarettes and liquor in the customs godown duly executing the bonds. The respondents were of the view that the pet....
TaxTMI