Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2009 (9) TMI 934

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Petitioner : Shri Ravi Raghavan, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R. K. Verma, DR ORDER Per M. Veeraiyan: This is an appeal against the order of the Commissioner No. 24/2004 dated 31.8.2004. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that the issue in this appeal relates to admissibility of cenvat credit of duty paid on the tattoos which were used b....

PrevPreviousNextNext