2014 (3) TMI 992
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Puja Banga, Brief Holder for the respondent. JUDGMENT The above revision applications raised similar question of law and, accordingly, are decided by this common judgment. 2. The revisionist sold "Jeeva soap" manufactured by it. The word "Jeeva" appears to be the brand name of the revisionist. While, therefore, selling "Jeeva soap", it represented to its intending buyers that it is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ay 12 per cent. tax. The contention of the revisionist before the appellate authority was that "Jeeva soap" is not a soap, but is an ayurvedic medicine. Though, such a contention was put forward, but it was never represented before the appellate authority or before the Tribunal that the revisionist, while selling "Jeeva soap", made a representation that it is an ayurvedic medicine and not a soap. ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI