2015 (9) TMI 498

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. Delay in filing and refiling the cross-objections is condoned. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 26.9.2013 (Annexure A-3) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench "A", Chandigarh (hereinafter refe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e DB at much lower price than the closing stock price or opening stock price? 2. The facts, in short, necessary for adjudication of the instant appeal as narrated therein are that the assessee filed his return of income on 29.9.2008 for the assessment year 2009-10 declaring an income of Rs. 3,79,160/-. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 29.12.2011 (Annexure A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of Rs. 2,00,000/- sustained by the Tribunal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue submitted that the Tribunal while partly accepting the appeal of the assessee had directed that in their opinion the estimated addition of Rs. 2,00,000/- was required to be made without giving any basis for the same as against the addition of Rs. 41,24,000/- mad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the said addition was the only income which the assessee got out of books of account and had not declared in his returned income. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(A) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal. On further appeal by the assessee, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not have estimated the sale price on the basis of rates of closing stock or ....