2012 (12) TMI 989

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....RDIK P MODH, ADVOCATE, WITH MR AMIT LADDHE, ADVOCTE No. 1 For the Respondent(s): MS AMEE YAJNIK, ADVOCATE No. 1 - 4 (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Heard learned advocates for the parties for final disposal of the petition. Petitioners have approached this Court with a limited prayer of protecting the petitioners' intere....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....12 and held that such refund of rebate was wrongly granted. The Commissioner observed that the petitioners have not challenged the appellate order dated 9­1­2009 when such order was already quashed by the High Court in its judgment dated 23­9­2009. Counsel further submitted that the Commissioner also observed that the order of the revisional authority was not in conformity with the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ented from making any further coercive recovery pursuant to the order of the Commissioner dated 24­7­2012 from the petitioners. Direct Service is permitted." The above order is self­-speaking. The case, in our opinion, is such where the recovery pursuant to the appellate order of the Commissioner should not be permitted at least till the revisions petitions are decided by the Gov....