2006 (10) TMI 431

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he first respondent non-suiting the petitioner to condone the delay of 648 days in filing the appeal against the order in original in Cc.Cus. 783/03 dated 31-12-2003 passed by the second respondent. 2. The reason stated in the application filed for condonation of delay was due to the inaction on the part of the counsel. It was further stated that as the two advocates by name Mr. Sivakumar ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nterprises Ltd. v. Union of India [2001 (133) E.L.T. 58 (Mad.)], this Court considered the issue in a batch of writ petitions on merit, set aside the order passed by the authorities and remitted the matter back-to re-consider the issue. As against the said decision, writ appeals are pending before the Division Bench. Not only before this Court, but also before several other High Courts, the simila....