2006 (11) TMI 630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the revenue against the order dated 25-10-2005 of Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B', Chandigarh in ITA No. 507/Chd/2003 proposing following substantial questions of law : "Whether, the Tribunal is right in law and facts of the case, in deleting the addition treating the unexplained accretion in the capital account of the partner as his income and not of the firm, when his explanatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t to the firm and the said partner had been duly assessed to the tax. It was held that in such a situation, addition to the income of the firm was not called for. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue relies upon the judgment of Allahabad High Court in Jagmohan Ram Ram Chandra v. CIT [2005] 274 ITR 405 (All.), wherein it was observed that if the firm fails to give explanation regarding source of d....