2007 (4) TMI 678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....23/2006, C/324/2006, C/325/2006 and C/326/2006 - -<br>Customs<br>-<br>Mr. P. G. Chacko, Member & Mr. P. Karthikeyan, Member , JJ. Smt. Sridevi, Shri A.K. Jayaraj & Shri G. Natarajan, For The Appellants Shri Vasa Seshagiri Rao, SDR For The Respondent ORDER Per P. G. CHACKO These appeals are against orders of the Commissioner of Customs confiscating the goods imported by the appellants, under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Penalty(In Rupees) 01. Nipun Impex C/144/2006 12,80,400 2,00,000 60,000 02. Rajeshwari Graphics C/249/2006 9,99,504 2,00,000 2,00,000 03. Aiswarya Enterprises C/322/2006 17,74,311 3,70,000 2,00,000 04. Aiswarya Enterprises C/323/2006 12,80,202 2,50,000 1,50,000 05. Aiswarya Enterprises C/324/2006 24,88,794 4,00,000 2,00,000 06. Rajeshwari Graphics C/325/2006 16,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... confiscation of the goods. The redemption fine and penalty imposed on them by the Commissioner are within reasonable limits having regard to the enhanced value of the goods. Hence Appeal No. C/144/2006 is dismissed. 3.The remaining appellants are also not challenging the enhancement of value, nor confiscation of the goods. Their grievance is against the quanta of fine and penalty imposed by the ....