2012 (6) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri P. Arul, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Heard both sides. 2.Both these appeals arise out of the same impugned order against which M/s. Ellen Industries had filed Appeal No. E/1/2012 and in their case predeposit of 50% of the duty amount has been ordered vide a detailed order passed on 26.3.2012. These two appeals have been filed by the co-noticees against whom there ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., he volunteers to predeposit 10% of the penalty amount within four weeks from today. 3.As regards the other appellant, M/s. Sri Meenakshi Steels, an adjournment request has been received but since there is a connected appeal and the issue is exactly similar, there is no justification for adjourning the case. 4.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel and accepting the offer m....