2003 (11) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. JUDGMENT Rule. Service of rule is waived by Shri D.N. Patel, learned Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel, for the respondents. At the request of the learned advocates, the petition is finally heard today. 2. The petitioner has challenged the validity of an order-in-appeal bearing No. 345/2003(Ahd-I), dated 12-6-2003 passed by respondent No. 2. 3. Learned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rly the ratio laid down by the CEGAT in its order dated 21-11-2002. It has been submitted by him that by not following the principle laid down in the order passed by the CEGAT, which has not been challenged by the respondent authorities and which has become final, respondent No. 2 has committed grave illegality and, therefore, the impugned order passed by respondent No. 2 deserves to be quashed an....