2015 (7) TMI 1033

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, Ms. Pooja Sharma and Shri B. Krishna Prasad, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V. Lakshmikumaran, M.P. Devanath, Vivek Sharma, Ms. L. Charanaya, Aditya Bhattacharya, Hemant Bajaj, Ambarish Pandey, Anandh K. and Rajesh Kumar, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER Respondent (BIL) is a distributor of AKAI products & purchased "AKAI" brand Colour TV Sets manufactured in India on job work ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt company. 4. Adjudicating Authority vide its order in original dated 27-1-1999 held that the project report could not be called a device to reduce the burden of duty since at the time when the project report was prepared by the respondents, the CTV's attracted specific rate of duty. The price at which JRE sold goods were comparable to the prices charged by other manufacturers similarly p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y Charted Accountants regarding the payment of interest of JRE was cover-up operation and concluded that JRE had accepted loans which were returned with interest to the manufacturer and hence the services of the respondent no. 2 were adequately compensated. Thus, relationship between the BIL & JRE was on principal to principal basis and the value charges by the job workers reprinted the assessable....