2013 (6) TMI 692

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ehgal, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER OM P No. 164 of 2013 in CEA No. 1 of 2013; OMP No. 165 of 2013 in CEA No. 2 of 2013 : Heard counsel for the parties. 2. These applications are for condoning delay in filing of appeals against the decision dated 22nd February, 2011. These appeals have been presented in this Court on 8th March....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the appeals. 5. In our opinion, the appellant(s) has been ill advised to file application for condonation of delay in the fact situation of the present case, for the simple reason that it is a case of representation of the proceedings before the Court of competent jurisdiction. The appeals originally filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court we....