2015 (7) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr B C Datta, AR For the Respondent : Mr Pakshi Rajan, Addl. Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: B S V Murthy: The respondents filed refund claims under Notification No. 5/2006-CE N.T dated 1.3.2006 on the ground that they could not utilize the accumulated credit available with them. There were three invoices for export of service during the month out of which in respect of two invoices, the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ision. 2. For better appreciation, paragraph 6 which is relevant and discussed the quantum of refund is reproduced below. "6. As far as the restriction of the quantum of refund is concerned, in terms of the relevant Notification, the refund of unutilized input service credit will be restricted to the extent of the ratio of export turnover to the total turnover for the given period to which t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erves to be rejected and is rejected. 3. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that they had filed a cross objection. However, he fairly agrees that the Cross Objections were filed only after they received notice of hearing in respect of department's appeal and further it is yet to be numbered. On going through the copy of the Cross Objection produced by the lear....