Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (6) TMI 901

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... agents for non deduction of TDS, in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, in short 'the Act'. 2. The assessee-company manufactures components and parts for process control installments and other products. It filed its return on 16.09.2008 declaring total income of Rs. 2,31,43,010/-. The same were 'summarily' processed. Thereafter, the Assessing Officer completed a regular assessment on 30.11.2010 inter alia holding assessee's claim on building repair of Rs. 17,11,804/- as capital expenses and disallowed commission paid to foreign export agents u/s.40(a)(i) amounting to Rs. 10,96,445/- for non deduction of TDS. 3. The CIT(A) has affirmed the Assessing Officer's action. This leaves the assessee aggrieved. 4. We come to asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../- being spent on the building in question. The issue between the parties is about its nature; i.e., whether capital or revenue as per the Revenue and assessee, respectively. The assessee's stand from the very beginning claims it to be not resulting any structural change in the factory building, non carrying out of any civil work, entire renovation meant to replace the old normal wear/tear of the building, non appointment of any civil engineer, no steel item being used and no new building or asset of different size and shape to have come up. The lower authorities are fair enough in not specifically rejecting these pleas. The assessee has only replastered, re-furnished and re-plumbered its factory building. This is not the Revenue's case tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e that the recipients had not only acted as commission agents but also provided technical services. This resulted in the impugned section 40(a)(ia) disallowance of Rs. 10,99,445/-. The assessee has failed in lower appellate order as well. 8. Heard both sides. Records perused. The 'Board' had issued circular no.786 dated 7.2.2000 exempting similar commission payments from TDS deduction. The same was withdrawn vide circular 7/09 dated 22.10.2009. The relevant assessment year is 2008-09 having accounting period from 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2009. There is no dispute between parties about the former circular and its withdrawal by a subsequent one. It is not the Revenue's contention that this withdrawal is with retrospective effect covering the earli....