2015 (5) TMI 947
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Member (J) And R K Singh, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellants : Ms Mekhla Anand and Shri Abhilasha Singh, Advs. For the Respondent : Shri Govind Dixit, AR ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal: Considering the fact that stay application is listed today itself, therefore application for early hearing of stay application has become infructous. Therefore, same is dismissed as infructous. 2. The applicant is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ility. For project namely, JERP, it is the contention of the appellant that as the project is executed in SEZ and services provided in the units located in SEZ, Service tax is not payable. Therefore, applicants are not required to pay service tax. It is also submitted that project KGD-6 is outside the territory of India therefore, they are not liable to pay service tax on that also. In these circu....