2015 (4) TMI 896

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent : Shri Rakesh Goyal, Addl Commr (AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair: The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No: PKS/17/BEL/2010 dated 29.04.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai III, wherein the learned Commissioner sustaining the Order-in-Original, rejected the appeal field by the appellant. 2. Brief fact of the case is that M/s Cadbury Ind....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mpted goods i.e. shells. The adjudicating authority after due process of law, confirmed the demand of Rs. 4,32,217/- under Section11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (said Act) along with appropriate interest. A penalty of equivalent amount was also imposed under the provisions of Section 11AC of the said Act. 2.1 Being aggrieved by the Order-in-Original No. 105/2010-11/DC/W.I/M.III dated 22.12....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0% as provided in Rule 6(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 it is not applicable. In this support, he relies on the following judgements:- (i) Rallis India Vs. UOI - 2009 (233) ELT 301 (Bom.) (ii) Jai Steels (India) Vs. CCE - 2010 (253) ELT 700 (Tri.-Del). (iii) CCE Vs. Pioneer Agro Industries Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT 258 (T) 4. On the other hand Shri Rakesh Goyal, learned A.R. appearing....