2015 (4) TMI 876

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DER The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition to quash the impugned order dated 25.8.2014 passed by the first respondent. 2. The petitioner company is doing business in Civil Engineering Construction. The petitioner has filed his return for the Assessment year 2011-2012. The respondent passed the assessment order dated 08.3.2014 raising a demand of Rs. 4,25,40,690/-. Aggrieve....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hwith. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. I have heard the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 4. It is not in dispute that at the time of rejecting the stay petition by the first respondent, the petitioner has made a statement before the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... final instalment shall be paid on or before 31.3.2015. With regard to the disputed amount of tax including TDS is concerned, the same is payable by the petitioner subject to the outcome of appeal/rectification. 6. Since the appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore, the authority is directed to dispose of the same within a period of three months from the dat....