2015 (4) TMI 743
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....arty in person) For the Respondent : Mr. R. Karthikeyan Addl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent in his proceedings in TIN 33715620172, quash the Notice, dated 10.03.2014 issued therein. 2. According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the impugned Notice, dated 10.03.2014, requiring the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Petitioner emphatically contends that the Respondent had not provided with a reasonable opportunity to the Petitioner by issuing show cause notice before passing any order of assessment. Also that, no working sheet for the claim made dated 10.03.2014 was provided to the Petitioner, by the Respondent. Added further, it is represented on behalf of the Petitioner that till date, the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ce of tax of Rs. 99,14,199.01 from the petitioner granting him 7 days' time to submit explanation. Pursuant to the said 2nd notice dated 11.07.2014, the Petitioner had caused a reply dated 18.07.2014 once again reiterating that it may be provided with detailed workings for the differential turnover and Differential Tax claimed in terms of Notice, dated 11.07.2014 and sought for 45 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ce of tax of Rs. 99,14,199.01, as claimed by the Respondent, this Court comes to an irresistible and inescapable conclusion that the impugned notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014 are liable to be interfered with in the interest of justice for the simple reason that there has been a Negation of the principles of natural justice and accordingly, this Court interfere with the said impugned n....
TaxTMI