Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (4) TMI 505

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent : K.R. Vasudevan and P. Dinesh, Advocates JUDGMENT 1. As a common question of law arises for consideration in all these appeals and the assessee is also the same and the orders are passed in respect of different assessment years, they are taken up for consideration together and disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The revenue has preferred these appeals against the common order pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The survey was conducted under Section 133A of Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as Act) on 05.02.2009 in the office premises of the assessee. In compliance of the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 26.05.2009, the assessee filed its returns of income for the assessment years 2005-2006 on 02.07.2009 admitting Nil income. After processing the said returns, the Assessing Authority held....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... two judgments of this Court in the case of CIT (International Taxation) v. Nike Inc., reported in  [2013] 34 taxmann.com 170(Karnataka) and also in the case of Jebon Corpn. India Liaison Office v. CIT (International Taxation) & ANR. repored in  (2011) 245 CTR (Kar) 300 and held that, the facts of this case are similar to the one in the case of Nike and therefore following the said judgm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....applicable to the facts of this case. In fact, in para No.7.5 the Tribunal has also taken note of the judgment of this Court in Jebon Corpn. India Liaison Office (supra) holding that the law laid down was not applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore he submits that no case for interference is made out. 8. The substantial question of law raised in these appeals for consideration of this Cou....