Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1974 (2) TMI 78

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anner prejudicial to the maintenance of Supplies and Services essential to the community. 2. The grounds on which the order was passed are as follows: (1) On 3-8-71 at about 18. 45 hours, you and your associates K. Mali, Baidyanath Sddhukhan and others were found by Watcher constable 1609 Bipad Bhanjan Burman and Watcher Constable 1368 Anath Bandhu Karmakar of Howrah D.E.B., who were on plain cloth duty to unload 5 bags of rice from lorry No. WBL 366 on Netaji Subhas Road near Allahabad Bank under Howrah P.S. and to dispose of the stock forthwith to the retailers of Nabakumar Nandy Lan @ ₹ 1.60 paise per k.g. As a result of this unloading 306 kgs. of rice were received short at the destination. You and your associates by your such ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emoval of rice from the F.G.I. account are highly prejudicial in the interest of maintenance of proper supply and service of essential commodities to the community. 3. The petitioner bad an opportunity to make a representation to the Advisory Board. In due course the detention order was confirmed by the State Government on 30.5.1972 and communicated to him on 1-6-1972. 4. Several objections were raised to the detention order. But it is not necessary to deal with all of them because the petitioner is bound to succeed on the ground that it does not appear that the District Magistrate could have been, in the circumstances of the case, reasonably satisfied that it was necessary to order the detention of the petitioner with a view to preventin....