2015 (4) TMI 462
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Member (T) And P. S. Pruthi, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri D. Nagvenkar, Addl. Commr. (A.R.) For the Respondent : Shri Durgesh Nadkarni, Adv. with Shri C.S. Biradar, Adv. and Shri Vinay Ansurkar, Adv. ORDER Per: M V Ravindra: This matter was referred to the Larger Bench by Single Member Bench by an order dated 14.11.2014 to have uniformity on the issue in view of the different....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the records, it transpires that the question which is referred to the Larger Bench by Single Member Bench noting there was different views on the issue i.e Affinity Express India Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 (37)STR 321 and Business Process Outsourcing (I) Pvt. Ltd. - 2014 (34)STR 364 (Tri.Bang) holding a view that the relevant date for determining the period of limitation will be the date of export of serv....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he view expressed in the case of Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by a Division Bench and no contrary view has been brought to our notice. It is to be also noted that in the decision in the case of Business Process Outsourcing (I) Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and Affinity Express India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) the Division Bench decision of Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. was not cited. Be that as it may, in the absence of ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI