2015 (3) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: Shri Prasad Paranjape, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri S. V. Nair, Assistant Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: M V Ravindran: This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. AKP/42/NSK/2010 dated 02/02/2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nasik. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the appellant have filed refund claims of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../2008-ST dated 07/12/2008 the said 'two percent' was substituted by 'ten percent'. He would draw our attention to the said notification. He would submit that they have filed refund claims on 27/06/2009 on which date Notification no. 33/2008 was in force and they have correctly claimed refund of 10% of the FOB value or the actual service tax paid whichever is less. He would draw our attenti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rposes also. 4. The learned Departmental Representative reiterates the findings of the lower authorities. 5. On perusal of the records and on consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, we find that the issue that falls for our consideration is whether the appellant herein is eligible for claiming refund of the service tax paid on the commission paid to the commission agents @10....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... existence, which in the case in hand, were eligible as per notification 41/2007-ST. In our considered view, the benefit of Notification no. 33/2008 can be claimed by the appellant from 07/12/2008 which is not in dispute as the Revenue has granted the said benefit to the appellant. 6. As regards the reliance placed by the learned counsel, the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cas....